Total Commodity Programs in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 3,845
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in California totaled $157,472,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Case Vander Eyk Jr Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $195,317 |
142 | Scheenstra Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $194,589 |
143 | Lakeside Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $193,364 |
144 | John & Marjorie Roeloffs | Tipton, CA 93272 | $193,312 |
145 | Jds Ranch | Tipton, CA 93272 | $192,669 |
146 | A & C Vieira Dairy | Winters, CA 95694 | $192,527 |
147 | Eric K Van Vliet Blue Star Dairy | Modesto, CA 95358 | $192,417 |
148 | H & M Agresti Trust Agreement | Ceres, CA 95307 | $191,457 |
149 | Avalon Dairy Farms LLC | Wasco, CA 93280 | $191,217 |
150 | Horizon Jerseys | Tipton, CA 93272 | $190,669 |
151 | Diamond D LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $190,513 |
152 | Maddox Dairy LLC | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $190,063 |
153 | Ajb Ranch Lp | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $189,880 |
154 | Open Sky Ranch Inc | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $189,236 |
155 | Bwc Weststeyn Dairy Lp | Linden, CA 95236 | $188,892 |
156 | Mulas Dairy Company | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $188,462 |
157 | Miranda Dairy | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $188,107 |
158 | J & D Wilson & Sons Dairy Lp | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $187,752 |
159 | Philip Verwey Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $187,402 |
160 | Dixie Creek Ranch | Hanford, CA 93230 | $187,330 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”