Total Commodity Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 58,262
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in California totaled $10,584,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Crettol Farms | Wasco, CA 93280 | $4,221,707 |
162 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,220,750 |
163 | Rio Rancho 2005 Bryce Partnership | Blythe, CA 92226 | $4,206,442 |
164 | Lohse Ranch | Glenn, CA 95943 | $4,197,276 |
165 | Danell Brothers Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $4,189,112 |
166 | Baker Creek Farming | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,188,341 |
167 | Progressive Associates Group | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $4,187,232 |
168 | Airoso Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $4,165,710 |
169 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $4,154,348 |
170 | Me Partnership | Durham, CA 95938 | $4,135,519 |
171 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $4,125,864 |
172 | Bullseye Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $4,116,255 |
173 | Theresa Buchanan Tammy Silva Partnership G S Farms | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $4,103,863 |
174 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $4,092,064 |
175 | Akin Ranch | Robbins, CA 95676 | $4,089,153 |
176 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $4,081,791 |
177 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $4,069,838 |
178 | Faxon Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,061,531 |
179 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $4,060,995 |
180 | Kirschenmann Bros | Shafter, CA 93263 | $4,055,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”