Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 275
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in California totaled $11,089,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | John D Hamilton Rancher Inc | El Centro, CA 92244 | $5,521 |
182 | Mamer Ranches Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,517 |
183 | Joe Omlin | Holtville, CA 92250 | $5,449 |
184 | C & C Enterprises | El Centro, CA 92243 | $5,437 |
185 | P Jeffrey Croak | Holtville, CA 92250 | $5,422 |
186 | Sheri L Smith | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,412 |
187 | Frank Van Der Linden III | Holtville, CA 92250 | $5,382 |
188 | Denise Johnson | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,318 |
189 | Douglas Dahm | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,283 |
190 | Barbara B Meyer Rev Trust Dtd 03/ | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,223 |
191 | William H Stokes Jr. | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $5,172 |
192 | Phillip Binggeli | Holtville, CA 92250 | $5,134 |
193 | Jose Camacho | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,055 |
194 | Rutherfords II | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,023 |
195 | Paul Dehar | Davis, CA 95617 | $4,995 |
196 | Morfam Inc | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $4,872 |
197 | Stanley Mitosinka | El Centro, CA 92243 | $4,812 |
198 | George Bishop | Vista, CA 92084 | $4,788 |
199 | Tony Terribilini | El Centro, CA 92243 | $4,776 |
200 | Chalupnik & Son | Brawley, CA 92227 | $4,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”