Total Commodity Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 58,262
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in California totaled $10,584,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Van Ruiten Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $4,051,196 |
182 | J & K Farms | Fresno, CA 93722 | $4,032,686 |
183 | Zonneveld Farms | Laton, CA 93242 | $4,025,068 |
184 | Sumner Peck Ranch Inc | Madera, CA 93638 | $4,014,949 |
185 | Cerro Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $4,005,786 |
186 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $4,001,800 |
187 | Dykstra Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $3,995,632 |
188 | Maben Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $3,982,466 |
189 | Terra Linda Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $3,951,758 |
190 | Pucheu Bros Farming Partnership | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $3,947,553 |
191 | Machado Dairy Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $3,946,853 |
192 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $3,943,786 |
193 | Davit Dayton Rice Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $3,938,291 |
194 | Franklin Group | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,929,534 |
195 | Zonneveld Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $3,925,183 |
196 | Mccracken/james Family Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $3,911,527 |
197 | Four B's | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $3,906,582 |
198 | Palla Rosa Farming Co | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $3,903,143 |
199 | Parisio Brothers | Willows, CA 95988 | $3,900,876 |
200 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $3,896,710 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”