Emergency Conservation Program in California, 2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 187

Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in California totaled $10,051,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Conservation Program
2023
1Rincon Farms IncGonzales, CA 93926$500,000
2, $453,445
3, $406,268
4Benito Valley Farms Inc.Hollister, CA 95023$360,342
5John D MoitozoGustine, CA 95322$272,314
6, $232,083
7, $216,470
8R Montanez Farms LLCWatsonville, CA 95077$210,477
9Pacific Livestock IncDavis, CA 95617$195,733
10, $185,696
11Palma's Produce IncOxnard, CA 93030$171,052
12, $170,635
13Clarie TellesFarmington, CA 95230$164,263
14Grant LeiningerVina, CA 96092$162,249
15Stanley J AzevedoGustine, CA 95322$153,384
16Spur X Livestock LLCLivermore, CA 94551$150,589
17Yolo Land & Cattle CoWoodland, CA 95695$144,143
18Vincent Sola PntspTipton, CA 93272$124,940
19Lerda-goni FarmsTulare, CA 93274$124,585
20, $124,269

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag