SELECT * FROM st_m2018 WHERE fips='06000' AND progcode='rice ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Rice Subsidies in California, 2018

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,214

Recipients of Rice Subsidies from farms in California totaled $68,789,000 in in 2018.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Rice Subsidies
2018
1Rehman Family Farms *Sacramento, CA 95834$459,934
2Colusa Indian Community EconomicColusa, CA 95932$438,532
3E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc *Chico, CA 95926$391,404
4S B & L La Grande *Williams, CA 95987$307,305
5J T & K Kalfsbeek *Arbuckle, CA 95912$301,856
6Pearson Ranch *Maxwell, CA 95955$268,603
7Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei *Robbins, CA 95676$266,062
8R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises *Durham, CA 95938$265,110
9Dhr Century Farming *Chico, CA 95928$256,660
10Schreiner Brothers *Knights Landing, CA 95645$234,668
11Valley Farms *Live Oak, CA 95953$234,539
12Caswell Farms *Durham, CA 95938$232,999
13Southam Joint Venture *Butte City, CA 95920$222,021
14Knight Farms *Glenn, CA 95943$221,462
15Bianchi Partnership *Durham, CA 95938$219,283
16Mark & Sandy Ottenwalter *Colusa, CA 95932$219,117
17Wilson Bend Farms *Knights Landing, CA 95645$217,676
18Eugene A Fenn Jv *Chico, CA 95928$216,869
19Canal Farms *Maxwell, CA 95955$198,413
20Oryza Partnership *Colusa, CA 95932$184,260

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag