Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in California, 1995-2020‡
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46,512
Recipients of Subtotal, Farming Subsidies from farms in California totaled $8,157,000,000 in from 1995-2020‡.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Subtotal, Farming Subsidies 1995-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farmers Rice Coop | Sacramento, CA 95851 | $146,174,314 |
| 2 | Dublin Farms * | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $21,241,816 |
| 3 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co * | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $16,809,487 |
| 4 | Hansen Ranches * | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $16,131,439 |
| 5 | S J R Farming * | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $15,889,600 |
| 6 | Gilkey Five * | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $13,369,571 |
| 7 | R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises * | Durham, CA 95938 | $13,143,932 |
| 8 | Starrh & Starrh Ctn Growers * | Shafter, CA 93263 | $11,510,342 |
| 9 | Red River Farms * | Blythe, CA 92225 | $11,495,223 |
| 10 | Bowles Farming Company, Inc * | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $11,372,885 |
| 11 | Sandridge Partners Lp * | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $11,115,549 |
| 12 | E W Merritt Farms * | Porterville, CA 93257 | $11,073,710 |
| 13 | J G Boswell Co | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $10,914,605 |
| 14 | Fisher Farms * | Blythe, CA 92225 | $10,228,762 |
| 15 | C J Ritchie Farms * | Visalia, CA 93291 | $9,766,139 |
| 16 | E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc * | Chico, CA 95926 | $9,705,859 |
| 17 | Rolling Hills Farms * | Oceano, CA 93445 | $9,564,535 |
| 18 | Canal Farms * | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $9,143,147 |
| 19 | Cloverdale Farms * | Hanford, CA 93230 | $9,088,038 |
| 20 | Colusa Indian Community Council * | Colusa, CA 95932 | $8,569,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf