Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,441
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in California totaled $37,784,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alvin Souza | Tulare, CA 93274 | $95,566 |
42 | Borba Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $95,520 |
43 | Lemstra Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $94,620 |
44 | Ajb Ranch Lp | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $94,184 |
45 | Ben Kimbler | Tollhouse, CA 93667 | $93,359 |
46 | Skyview Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $92,211 |
47 | Dick Vanderham & Sons Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $91,905 |
48 | De Boer Dairy/southern Cross | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $91,800 |
49 | Jack & Ellie Mae Kasbergen | Woodland, CA 95695 | $90,674 |
50 | Sun Valley Jersey Dairy Inc | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $88,505 |
51 | Lakeview Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $87,409 |
52 | De Groot Dairies | Tulare, CA 93274 | $87,288 |
53 | Rene Larranaga | Alturas, CA 96101 | $87,111 |
54 | James Barnebee | Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | $84,806 |
55 | Jose Ribeiro & Son Dairy | Laton, CA 93242 | $84,714 |
56 | De Jager North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $84,468 |
57 | Thomas F Moiola | Brawley, CA 92227 | $83,837 |
58 | Marquez Dairy LLC | Chino, CA 91710 | $83,235 |
59 | Jim Areias | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $81,603 |
60 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $80,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”