Farm Subsidy information
California
Total Subsidies in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 80,144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in California totaled $18,180,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robinson Farms | Blythe, CA 92226 | $6,500,138 |
62 | Wheeler Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93312 | $6,441,574 |
63 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $6,425,180 |
64 | Westfarmers | Visalia, CA 93291 | $6,360,803 |
65 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $6,340,213 |
66 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $6,325,864 |
67 | Perez & Perez Family Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $6,309,237 |
68 | D L M Partners A California Prtnr | Fresno, CA 93790 | $6,303,242 |
69 | Lewis Maiorino Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $6,207,152 |
70 | Jack Seiler Farms Gp | Palo Verde, CA 92266 | $6,163,525 |
71 | B & L Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,116,548 |
72 | Van Dyke Brothers | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $6,105,880 |
73 | Tyson/ichida Farms Partnership | Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | $5,942,195 |
74 | Tillema Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $5,936,587 |
75 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $5,896,737 |
76 | Costa View Farms No 2 | Madera, CA 93637 | $5,887,873 |
77 | Boeger Land Company | Gridley, CA 95948 | $5,788,190 |
78 | Roduner Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $5,743,378 |
79 | Gcm Farms | Stratford, CA 93266 | $5,731,963 |
80 | L Riccomini And Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93312 | $5,708,741 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”