Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,432
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in California totaled $70,629,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Martin De Jager- Martin & Carolyn Dejager Family T | Merced, CA 95340 | $286,660 |
22 | Hwy 12 Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95219 | $285,009 |
23 | Detar Livestock Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $282,419 |
24 | S & S Farming Co | Dixon, CA 95620 | $272,993 |
25 | Atkinson Farms II Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $271,235 |
26 | Dennis Katsuki | Isleton, CA 95641 | $269,872 |
27 | Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei | Robbins, CA 95676 | $266,062 |
28 | Holdener Farms Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $265,590 |
29 | E & H Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $255,214 |
30 | Graydon & Virginia Nichols Family Revocable Trust | Palm Desert, CA 92260 | $255,196 |
31 | Silveira Brothers Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $252,605 |
32 | David Robertson | Linden, CA 95236 | $246,239 |
33 | Leisha Robertson | Linden, CA 95236 | $246,239 |
34 | Seifert Dairy II Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $244,658 |
35 | Van Ruiten Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $243,715 |
36 | Dutra Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95337 | $235,602 |
37 | John M Bianchi | Durham, CA 95938 | $232,952 |
38 | George Biagi Jr | Stockton, CA 95219 | $230,762 |
39 | Dhr Century Farming | Chico, CA 95928 | $225,196 |
40 | Frank N Rocha Dairy L P | Escalon, CA 95320 | $224,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”