Conservation Reserve Program in California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 144

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $1,919,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
2021
41Frank D KuhnleShandon, CA 93461$17,429
42Ian Irving Mcmillan IIShandon, CA 93461$15,573
43Mcmillan Generation Skipping TrustShandon, CA 93461$15,572
44K W RanchSanta Margarita, CA 93453$14,994
45Theodore J JohnsonMontague, CA 96064$14,446
46Carol A Ernst Family TrustEdgewood, WA 98372$13,885
47Frederick F Ernst 2004 Revocable TrustRiverside, CA 92507$13,885
48Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004Shandon, CA 93461$13,802
49Diane FrostWoodland, CA 95695$13,339
50William R And Eldora M Barnes Fam TrCastaic, CA 91384$13,225
51Richie Fam Tr Of 2002North Fork, CA 93643$12,405
52Hunewill Land & Livestock Co IncWellington, NV 89444$11,646
53Roy & Dana RichardsMerced, CA 95340$11,310
54Mitch RothSan Miguel, CA 93451$10,837
55Kelly Miller RothSan Miguel, CA 93451$10,833
56Stacy Miller BonnifieldSan Miguel, CA 93451$10,833
57Robert J Laughlin Jr Separate Property TrustSan Miguel, CA 93451$10,554
58Klamath L & C IncSanta Cruz, CA 95060$10,060
59Kathryn MckeonSeattle, WA 98199$9,330
60John BeckSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$8,485

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag