Conservation Reserve Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,343
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $122,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Hickey Ranches Inc | Merrill, OR 97633 | $370,136 |
82 | Rominger Brothers Farms Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $369,018 |
83 | William & Doris Mouren Revocable | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $367,027 |
84 | Rex Houghton | Montague, CA 96064 | $365,037 |
85 | Mysterious 1992 Living Trust Aka Cole Rowan | Fresno, CA 93720 | $361,222 |
86 | Caroline Eng | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $355,567 |
87 | Janet Wiegand | Cottonwood, AZ 86326 | $352,960 |
88 | Carol Chastain | Dixon, CA 95620 | $352,959 |
89 | Forest House Ranch | Yreka, CA 96097 | $351,666 |
90 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $351,661 |
91 | Abele Farms | Yolo, CA 95697 | $347,360 |
92 | Michael Crebbin Et Al Partnership | Montague, CA 96064 | $345,369 |
93 | Sutter Buttes Outing Club | Roseville, CA 95661 | $343,767 |
94 | Violet Ernst | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $334,994 |
95 | George R Work | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $330,061 |
96 | Timothy Testerman | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $325,376 |
97 | Cindy Switzer | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $324,962 |
98 | Pinole Land & Cattle | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $324,918 |
99 | Robert Pritchard | San Francisco, CA 94116 | $320,475 |
100 | Robert S Currey Trust | Dixon, CA 95620 | $320,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”