Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 8,430
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in California totaled $91,422,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Flynn Cattle Company Lp | Ducor, CA 93218 | $92,785 |
42 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $91,855 |
43 | Frank N Rocha Dairy L P | Escalon, CA 95320 | $91,801 |
44 | Frusetta Cattle Company | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $91,537 |
45 | Robert B Frost | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $90,453 |
46 | Edwin Brasil Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $89,987 |
47 | Patrick W Fulton | Bayside, CA 95524 | $89,689 |
48 | Rynsburger Dairy | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $89,370 |
49 | Jaureguy Family Trust No 1 | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $89,245 |
50 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $89,185 |
51 | Elliott Land & Cattle Co | Cutler, CA 93615 | $88,811 |
52 | Joe Fernandes And Sons Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $88,227 |
53 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $87,108 |
54 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $86,984 |
55 | James Walker | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $86,760 |
56 | Albert John Roen | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $86,637 |
57 | Rollin Valley Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $86,238 |
58 | Diamond Sheep Company Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93390 | $86,019 |
59 | Scott Haydn-myer | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $85,775 |
60 | Tollenaar Holsteins | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $85,744 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”