Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 11,153
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in California totaled $201,896,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bidart Dairy II LLC | Chino, CA 91708 | $303,220 |
42 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $301,930 |
43 | Gregory D Hooker Diamond H Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $293,320 |
44 | Cloverdale Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $292,834 |
45 | Wildcat Farms, LLC | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $287,222 |
46 | Stephen And Debra Tarke Farms, Lp | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $281,449 |
47 | Berne H Evans III August C Hansch Etal Ptr Dba Sol | Exeter, CA 93221 | $281,123 |
48 | High Ranches Limited Partnership | Turlock, CA 95380 | $275,422 |
49 | Maddox Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $275,350 |
50 | Emerald Farms LLC | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $275,308 |
51 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $271,843 |
52 | Greenwood Dairy | Baltic, SD 57003 | $262,179 |
53 | R B Sandrini Farms | Delano, CA 93215 | $250,000 |
54 | Tos Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $250,000 |
55 | Michael Gragnani Farms | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $250,000 |
56 | Reynolds Packing Corp | Lodi, CA 95240 | $250,000 |
57 | V & A Lagorio Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $250,000 |
58 | All State Packers Inc | Lodi, CA 95241 | $250,000 |
59 | Anthony Vineyards Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93389 | $250,000 |
60 | Panoche Creek Trust | Madera, CA 93637 | $250,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”