Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Alameda County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 64
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $1,452,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steve C Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $23,905 |
22 | Janice Marciel | Livermore, CA 94551 | $23,871 |
23 | Dennis Lopez | Byron, CA 94514 | $22,735 |
24 | Carl Mast | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $22,255 |
25 | John R Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $21,904 |
26 | Joseph M Murray Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $20,236 |
27 | T N Cattle Co Inc | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $20,213 |
28 | Joan Jess | Byron, CA 94514 | $19,693 |
29 | Hoover Cattle Company LLC | Moraga, CA 94556 | $19,141 |
30 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $18,903 |
31 | Castello Ranch LLC | Tracy, CA 95391 | $17,281 |
32 | Robert P Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $16,880 |
33 | John M Luiz | Modesto, CA 95358 | $16,158 |
34 | Santucci Livestock LLC | Livermore, CA 94550 | $15,311 |
35 | Imhof Tractor Service Inc | Sunol, CA 94586 | $13,938 |
36 | Charles Sweet | Livermore, CA 94550 | $13,589 |
37 | John Bettencourt | Livermore, CA 94551 | $13,379 |
38 | The Garcia Family Trust | Sunol, CA 94586 | $10,896 |
39 | Kevin Griffith | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $10,567 |
40 | Paul Fagliano | Livermore, CA 94551 | $10,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”