Farm Subsidy information
Alameda County, California
Total Subsidies in Alameda County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 80
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $3,246,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Janice Marciel | Livermore, CA 94551 | $23,366 |
22 | Imhof Tractor Service Inc | Sunol, CA 94586 | $22,879 |
23 | Mark Beyer | Manteca, CA 95336 | $21,853 |
24 | Santucci Livestock LLC | Livermore, CA 94550 | $19,506 |
25 | Steve C Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $19,467 |
26 | Vieux Family Properties LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $19,161 |
27 | Corneliu Prelipceanu Dba Elsi Bees | San Leandro, CA 94578 | $18,572 |
28 | Jackson Land & Cattle Lp | Livermore, CA 94551 | $18,240 |
29 | John R Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $14,970 |
30 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $13,379 |
31 | Raelene Vieux | Fremont, CA 94539 | $12,578 |
32 | Daniel Escobar | Fremont, CA 94539 | $11,217 |
33 | Dennis Lopez | Byron, CA 94514 | $9,990 |
34 | Carl Mast | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $9,721 |
35 | Melvin Castello Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $9,185 |
36 | Grass Lands Property LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $8,675 |
37 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $8,198 |
38 | Dolores Kuhn | Byron, CA 94514 | $8,163 |
39 | , | $8,080 | |
40 | Gonsalves Ranch | Modesto, CA 95358 | $7,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”