Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Alameda County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 64
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $1,452,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David M Lesico | Danville, CA 94526 | $9,647 |
42 | Daniel Escobar | Fremont, CA 94539 | $9,595 |
43 | Clayton Koopmann | Sunol, CA 94586 | $9,520 |
44 | Madonna Frick | Livermore, CA 94551 | $7,921 |
45 | Alfonso Casillas | Tracy, CA 95376 | $7,520 |
46 | Daniel Marciel | Livermore, CA 94551 | $6,672 |
47 | Pimentel Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $6,584 |
48 | Darrel Sweet | Livermore, CA 94550 | $6,304 |
49 | Albert H Morris | Livermore, CA 94551 | $5,449 |
50 | Steve Gonsalves | Livermore, CA 94550 | $5,200 |
51 | Dale Scroggins | Sunol, CA 94586 | $3,767 |
52 | Grass Lands Property LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $3,638 |
53 | Dolores Kuhn | Byron, CA 94514 | $3,282 |
54 | Michael Garcia | Sunol, CA 94586 | $3,244 |
55 | Charles V Foscalina Jr | Livermore, CA 94550 | $2,670 |
56 | Donald R Staysa | Livermore, CA 94551 | $2,668 |
57 | Daniel Morais | Martinez, CA 94553 | $2,273 |
58 | Clarie Telles | Farmington, CA 95230 | $1,918 |
59 | , | $1,778 | |
60 | Greg Harris | Livermore, CA 94550 | $1,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”