Total Disaster Programs in Alameda County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 223
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $20,299,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steve C Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $129,348 |
42 | John Cronin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $124,866 |
43 | Dennis Lopez | Byron, CA 94514 | $123,698 |
44 | Gonsalves Ranch | Modesto, CA 95358 | $122,623 |
45 | Vernon Rose Jr | Livermore, CA 94550 | $119,233 |
46 | N3 Cattle Company LLC | Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 | $115,085 |
47 | Castello Ranch LLC | Tracy, CA 95391 | $114,872 |
48 | Laurel Mendoza | Livermore, CA 94551 | $114,075 |
49 | Phyllis Castello | Tracy, CA 95391 | $110,242 |
50 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $108,060 |
51 | Robert P Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $106,502 |
52 | , | $104,649 | |
53 | Mark Rose | Livermore, CA 94550 | $103,351 |
54 | Dolores Andrade | Livermore, CA 94550 | $100,580 |
55 | Hoover Cattle Company LLC | Moraga, CA 94556 | $99,734 |
56 | Leo Murray | Livermore, CA 94550 | $92,563 |
57 | Estate Of Anthony Castello | Tracy, CA 95391 | $91,703 |
58 | Donald H Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $90,868 |
59 | Rodger H Mast | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $84,532 |
60 | T N Cattle Co Inc | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $83,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”