Total Disaster Programs in Alameda County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 81
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $3,717,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $30,669 |
42 | Madonna Frick | Livermore, CA 94551 | $29,910 |
43 | Carl Mast | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $29,095 |
44 | Robert P Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $27,665 |
45 | John M Luiz | Modesto, CA 95358 | $27,521 |
46 | Pombo 7p Cattle Co LLC | Tracy, CA 95378 | $24,881 |
47 | , | $24,730 | |
48 | Darrel Sweet | Livermore, CA 94550 | $22,992 |
49 | Charles Sweet | Livermore, CA 94550 | $22,045 |
50 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $21,785 |
51 | Albert H Morris | Livermore, CA 94551 | $21,092 |
52 | John Bettencourt | Livermore, CA 94551 | $20,155 |
53 | Dolores Kuhn | Byron, CA 94514 | $19,974 |
54 | The Garcia Family Trust | Sunol, CA 94586 | $19,562 |
55 | Paul Fagliano | Livermore, CA 94551 | $17,955 |
56 | Clayton Koopmann | Sunol, CA 94586 | $17,091 |
57 | Grass Lands Property LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $16,778 |
58 | Corneliu S Prelipceanu | San Leandro, CA 94578 | $15,389 |
59 | Daniel Marciel | Livermore, CA 94551 | $13,568 |
60 | David M Lesico | Danville, CA 94526 | $12,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”