Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Alameda County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 125
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $7,739,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dayton Silva | Acampo, CA 95220 | $27,953 |
62 | Madonna Frick | Livermore, CA 94551 | $25,622 |
63 | N3 Cattle Company LLC | Torrance, CA 90502 | $25,164 |
64 | Melvin Castello Sr | Livermore, CA 94551 | $24,461 |
65 | Darrel Sweet | Livermore, CA 94550 | $24,402 |
66 | Daniel Marciel | Livermore, CA 94551 | $23,940 |
67 | Imhof Tractor Service Inc | Sunol, CA 94586 | $18,891 |
68 | Kevin Griffith | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $17,859 |
69 | Dolores Kuhn | Byron, CA 94514 | $15,227 |
70 | Hachmann & Murray Livestock | Livermore, CA 94550 | $14,803 |
71 | Estate Of Ernest Pombo Dba Pombo | Tracy, CA 95376 | $14,644 |
72 | Eva Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $14,543 |
73 | Phyllis Castello | Tracy, CA 95391 | $13,840 |
74 | Laurel Mendoza | Livermore, CA 94551 | $13,062 |
75 | Russell Fields | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $12,648 |
76 | Herbert Hachman Jr | Dublin, CA 94568 | $12,317 |
77 | John Cronin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $11,525 |
78 | Andrew Christensen | Livermore, CA 94550 | $10,818 |
79 | Kenny & Andrew Watkins Farm Partnership | Linden, CA 95236 | $9,030 |
80 | Jeff Nielsen | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $8,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”