Farm Subsidy information
Alameda County, California
Total Subsidies in Alameda County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 93
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $2,345,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Matthew Grant Stanley | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $4,925 |
62 | Jasanjot Singh | Dublin, CA 94568 | $4,274 |
63 | Alfonso Casillas | Tracy, CA 95376 | $3,839 |
64 | Michael Garcia | Sunol, CA 94586 | $3,768 |
65 | Gary L Kuhn Jr | Tracy, CA 95391 | $3,758 |
66 | Matthew Juanes | Sunnyvale, CA 94086 | $3,022 |
67 | Gary Kuhn | Byron, CA 94514 | $2,895 |
68 | Patrick Layton James | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,787 |
69 | John Cronin | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,575 |
70 | Daniel Escobar | Fremont, CA 94539 | $2,494 |
71 | Mark Bradford | Livermore, CA 94551 | $2,190 |
72 | Vernon Rose Jr | Livermore, CA 94550 | $2,149 |
73 | Dolores Andrade | Livermore, CA 94550 | $2,149 |
74 | Tom Bettencourt | Livermore, CA 94551 | $2,089 |
75 | Melvin Silva | Fremont, CA 94536 | $2,077 |
76 | Robert Pombo | Tracy, CA 95304 | $2,022 |
77 | Robert P Frick | Livermore, CA 94550 | $1,969 |
78 | John Masters | Livermore, CA 94551 | $1,540 |
79 | Peter Beiersdorfer | Livermore, CA 94550 | $1,537 |
80 | Sylvia E Sweet-chatagnier | Livermore, CA 94550 | $1,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”