Farm Subsidy information
Alameda County, California
Total Subsidies in Alameda County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 80
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alameda County, California totaled $3,246,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Spur X Livestock LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $468,495 |
2 | , | $406,268 | |
3 | Fields Livestock | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $205,180 |
4 | Coelho Ranches LLC | Modesto, CA 95358 | $202,943 |
5 | Midway Livestock | Livermore, CA 94551 | $177,886 |
6 | Richard Mendoza | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $142,642 |
7 | , | $104,649 | |
8 | Stephen A Fields | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $79,700 |
9 | Hoover Cattle Company LLC | Moraga, CA 94556 | $65,370 |
10 | Joseph R Paulo | Livermore, CA 94551 | $57,743 |
11 | Vernon D Flanigan | Livermore, CA 94551 | $48,153 |
12 | Bert R Elworthy | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $46,939 |
13 | Peter Scott Beyer | Livermore, CA 94551 | $44,531 |
14 | Laurel Mendoza | Livermore, CA 94551 | $44,095 |
15 | Castello Ranch LLC | Tracy, CA 95391 | $43,627 |
16 | Ronald Seever | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $43,493 |
17 | Peter Swanson | Tracy, CA 95377 | $40,110 |
18 | Leland Stanley | Livermore, CA 94551 | $37,697 |
19 | Joseph M Murray Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $36,023 |
20 | Paul Fagliano | Livermore, CA 94551 | $25,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>