Farm Subsidy information
Amador County, California
Total Subsidies in Amador County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 60
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Amador County, California totaled $1,099,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Paul Biehle | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $4,141 |
42 | Richard Hutchison | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $3,758 |
43 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $3,342 |
44 | Steven Todd Garcia | Ione, CA 95640 | $2,431 |
45 | Susan J. Kohler-anderson | Ione, CA 95640 | $2,310 |
46 | Neilsen Ranch Ptr | El Dorado, CA 95623 | $2,271 |
47 | Whittle Ranch Inc | Altaville, CA 95221 | $2,269 |
48 | John A Miles | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $2,198 |
49 | Jon Questo | Ione, CA 95640 | $1,588 |
50 | Daniel W Port | Ione, CA 95640 | $1,444 |
51 | , | $1,050 | |
52 | William Penrose Bassett | Jackson, CA 95642 | $1,005 |
53 | Todd Ohm | Ione, CA 95640 | $997 |
54 | Jessica Clarice Arditto | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $845 |
55 | J W Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $785 |
56 | Pt Ranch LLC | Ione, CA 95640 | $761 |
57 | Leisel Finley | Ione, CA 95640 | $578 |
58 | Andrew D Borth | Lockeford, CA 95237 | $346 |
59 | Dominique J Woods | Pine Grove, CA 95665 | $229 |
60 | Perry Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $167 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous