Farm Subsidy information
Amador County, California
Total Subsidies in Amador County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 222
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Amador County, California totaled $11,062,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mark Lopes | Ione, CA 95640 | $3,712 |
142 | , | $3,663 | |
143 | La Mesa Vineyards LLC | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $3,625 |
144 | Robert J Martin | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $3,500 |
145 | Cathy Landgraf | River Pines, CA 95675 | $3,500 |
146 | The Butler Noble Trust 1975 | Jackson, CA 95642 | $3,500 |
147 | Phillip Joses | Ione, CA 95640 | $3,500 |
148 | Gary V Johnson | Ione, CA 95640 | $3,462 |
149 | Rubidoux Ridge Vineyard LLC | Fiddletown, CA 95629 | $3,439 |
150 | Tim J Lewis | Herald, CA 95638 | $3,434 |
151 | Peggy Seever | Jackson, CA 95642 | $3,416 |
152 | Connie Murdock | Ione, CA 95640 | $3,301 |
153 | John Kirkpatrick | Jackson, CA 95642 | $3,250 |
154 | Louise Pasquetti | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $3,250 |
155 | Sunset Endeavors Inc | Sattley, CA 96124 | $3,089 |
156 | Jessica Clarice Arditto | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $3,026 |
157 | Robert L Honn | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $3,000 |
158 | , | $2,976 | |
159 | Teresa Kuiken | Volcano, CA 95689 | $2,898 |
160 | Dave Jauch | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,876 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”