Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Butte County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 607
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Butte County, California totaled $15,160,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | F D S Farms | Durham, CA 95938 | $130,683 |
22 | Almont Orchards Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $130,679 |
23 | Rancho Esquon Inc - Durham Ca &wh& | Concord, CA 94522 | $129,158 |
24 | St Vincent Orchards | Chico, CA 95926 | $127,236 |
25 | Millennium Farms LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $125,281 |
26 | Anderson Family Orchards LLC | Glenn, CA 95943 | $118,721 |
27 | Carrdi LLC | Gridley, CA 95948 | $116,619 |
28 | Mp Farms | Brisbane, CA 94005 | $110,661 |
29 | Happy Orchards Inc | Durham, CA 95938 | $110,352 |
30 | Thiara Agribusiness | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $109,210 |
31 | Cana Ranch Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $102,842 |
32 | Todd M York | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $102,409 |
33 | Westside Production Solutions, Inc | Sacramento, CA 95814 | $101,743 |
34 | A. S. Kalkat Farming | Gridley, CA 95948 | $100,880 |
35 | Dan Paiva | Chico, CA 95973 | $96,416 |
36 | Jack Mariani Co | Gridley, CA 95948 | $95,605 |
37 | Ord Bend Farms Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $95,152 |
38 | West Chico Properties Dba Hula Nut Company | Biggs, CA 95917 | $94,945 |
39 | James C Schroer | Chico, CA 95928 | $93,403 |
40 | Bremner Farms | Chico, CA 95928 | $93,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”