Loan Deficiency in Butte County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 582
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Butte County, California totaled $49,865,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Josiassen Farms Inc | Richvale, CA 95974 | $159,160 |
102 | Blavo Land Company | Durham, CA 95938 | $155,737 |
103 | Skinner Orchard Management | Chico, CA 95928 | $154,887 |
104 | Louis M Anderson | Chico, CA 95928 | $152,555 |
105 | Leon Brink Corp | Biggs, CA 95917 | $151,975 |
106 | Emerald Valley Farms Inc | Biggs, CA 95917 | $150,050 |
107 | Jonnypop Inc | Biggs, CA 95917 | $150,050 |
108 | Red Hill Ranch Inc | Gridley, CA 95948 | $146,672 |
109 | Nichols Ranch Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $144,198 |
110 | Sheryl Ponciano | Durham, CA 95938 | $144,019 |
111 | Leland R Mcpherrin | Escalon, CA 95320 | $143,683 |
112 | Darrell A Bates | Richvale, CA 95974 | $141,125 |
113 | Anderson Family Trust Of 2006 | Chico, CA 95928 | $140,835 |
114 | Dsl Lamalfa Family Partnership | Richvale, CA 95974 | $139,781 |
115 | Robert J Hall | Biggs, CA 95917 | $139,772 |
116 | B B Ranch | Benicia, CA 94510 | $139,327 |
117 | Ryan C Manes | Chico, CA 95928 | $137,605 |
118 | Joan C Webster | Durham, CA 95938 | $134,089 |
119 | W Gregory Johnson Farms | Durham, CA 95938 | $131,943 |
120 | Geiger Family Trust | Richvale, CA 95974 | $131,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”