Emergency Conservation Program in Butte County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 182
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Butte County, California totaled $2,455,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pacific Realty Assoc Lp Dba M & T | Portland, OR 97224 | $136,290 |
| 2 | Jem Farms Management LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $130,152 |
| 3 | 2 D S D LLC | Woodside, CA 94062 | $93,408 |
| 4 | Jaswant S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $83,054 |
| 5 | James R Lewis Orchards Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $80,381 |
| 6 | J E M Farms, Ptshp. | Fresno, CA 93711 | $61,432 |
| 7 | Columbia Orchards Ltd | Chico, CA 95927 | $59,668 |
| 8 | James Paiva | Chico, CA 95973 | $55,493 |
| 9 | Meline & Rabo Inc | Durham, CA 95938 | $51,200 |
| 10 | John B Nichols | Chico, CA 95928 | $47,439 |
| 11 | Jaismin Kaur Pamma | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $43,636 |
| 12 | Nicolaus Nut Company Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $42,196 |
| 13 | River Bend Orchards | Chico, CA 95927 | $41,659 |
| 14 | Mohammad Anwar | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $39,149 |
| 15 | Parrott Investment Co | Chico, CA 95928 | $37,824 |
| 16 | C F Koehnen & Sons Orchards | Glenn, CA 95943 | $37,643 |
| 17 | Mead Brothers | Chico, CA 95928 | $35,088 |
| 18 | Fortier & Sons Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $34,782 |
| 19 | Vina Gold Orchards, L.p. | Chico, CA 95928 | $34,646 |
| 20 | Sukhraj Singh Pamma | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $34,189 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
