Farm Subsidy information
Butte County, California
Total Subsidies in Butte County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 629
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butte County, California totaled $11,926,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jan Meyer | Biggs, CA 95917 | $54,728 |
22 | Smith Pollination Services Inc | Paradise, CA 95969 | $53,725 |
23 | Starkey Farms | Oroville, CA 95965 | $53,601 |
24 | St James Orchards LLC | Durham, CA 95938 | $53,202 |
25 | Hengst Orchards Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $51,959 |
26 | Bradley & Mary Wurlitzer Jv | Chico, CA 95926 | $47,491 |
27 | Philip L. Wilson And Barbara I. Wilson Family Trus | Chico, CA 95973 | $46,629 |
28 | Bangor Ranch LLC | Bangor, CA 95914 | $45,511 |
29 | Thompson Farms Lp | Chico, CA 95973 | $43,106 |
30 | Richard A Peterson Jv | Durham, CA 95938 | $42,743 |
31 | Eugene A Fenn Jv | Chico, CA 95928 | $42,505 |
32 | Jason Justeson | Gridley, CA 95948 | $41,669 |
33 | Valley Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $41,136 |
34 | Robert Foster | Oroville, CA 95965 | $40,621 |
35 | Trent Meyer | Gridley, CA 95948 | $37,918 |
36 | Sohnrey And Son Family Farm | Durham, CA 95938 | $37,594 |
37 | Karmdeep Singh Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $35,358 |
38 | Forward Family Farming | Gridley, CA 95948 | $35,201 |
39 | Joe Justeson | Gridley, CA 95948 | $34,602 |
40 | Patane Farms, Farming Group, LLC | Gridley, CA 95948 | $34,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”