Farm Subsidy information
Calaveras County, California
Total Subsidies in Calaveras County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 73
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $1,629,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Libby Rader-kassik | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $15,810 |
22 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $14,938 |
23 | Hans A Zumbach | Angels Camp, CA 95221 | $13,449 |
24 | Perry Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $13,052 |
25 | Rolleri Ranch | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $11,911 |
26 | Elliott Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $9,601 |
27 | Russell Stephens | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $9,466 |
28 | Richard Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $7,229 |
29 | Rock Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $7,120 |
30 | Don Peirano | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $7,033 |
31 | Yvonne Tiscornia | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $7,003 |
32 | Thomas Whittle | Altaville, CA 95221 | $6,933 |
33 | Matt Engelhart | Linden, CA 95236 | $6,698 |
34 | Les Strojan | Farmington, CA 95230 | $5,932 |
35 | Michael W Robie | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,625 |
36 | Michael Airola | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $5,583 |
37 | Keith Hafley | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,545 |
38 | Cinco Cattle Company LLC | Wilton, CA 95693 | $5,169 |
39 | Barbara Knowles | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,156 |
40 | Sam J Tunnell | Woodbridge, CA 95258 | $5,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”