Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 68
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $731,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $14,998 |
22 | Russell Stephens | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $14,888 |
23 | Cinco Cattle Company LLC | Wilton, CA 95693 | $14,094 |
24 | Dennis C Borba Land & Livestock Inc | Farmington, CA 95230 | $13,296 |
25 | Robert Garamendi | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $13,007 |
26 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $10,445 |
27 | Mattley Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $10,431 |
28 | Robert Bisla | Linden, CA 95236 | $9,419 |
29 | Barbara Knowles | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $8,726 |
30 | Sam J Tunnell | Woodbridge, CA 95258 | $7,911 |
31 | Rasmussen Ranch LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $6,753 |
32 | Kevin Griffith | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $6,016 |
33 | Amanda Folendorf | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $5,778 |
34 | Michael W Robie | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,625 |
35 | Gerald Dunn | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $5,601 |
36 | Zane Gookin | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $5,450 |
37 | Keith Hafley | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,065 |
38 | , | $4,536 | |
39 | , | $4,356 | |
40 | , | $3,959 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”