Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 67
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $1,177,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hans A Zumbach | Angels Camp, CA 95221 | $7,730 |
42 | John R Lopes | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $6,997 |
43 | Jon Whittle | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $6,752 |
44 | Austin Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $5,891 |
45 | Don Peirano | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $5,879 |
46 | Renaldo Broglio | Altaville, CA 95221 | $5,334 |
47 | Lance Oneto | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $5,269 |
48 | Jason Zumbach | Altaville, CA 95221 | $5,115 |
49 | Frank Gilbeau | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $4,725 |
50 | Gerald Dunn | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $4,673 |
51 | Gary F Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $3,445 |
52 | Franziska Schabram | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $3,296 |
53 | James H Saunders | Vallecito, CA 95251 | $3,266 |
54 | Jason Zumbach | Farmington, CA 95230 | $3,245 |
55 | Melvin Castello Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $2,768 |
56 | Kent Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $2,711 |
57 | Slagle Cattle Co | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $2,708 |
58 | Keith Hafley | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $2,504 |
59 | Michael O Riley | Murphys, CA 95247 | $2,495 |
60 | Pearl M Cosgrave Trust | Altaville, CA 95221 | $2,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”