Total Disaster Programs in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 312
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $10,399,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Nakagawa Family Trust | Acampo, CA 95220 | $26,311 |
82 | Rich Gulch Ranch Inc | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $26,306 |
83 | Campstool Lp | Danville, CA 94526 | $26,187 |
84 | Jon Questo | Ione, CA 95640 | $25,990 |
85 | Sam J Tunnell | Woodbridge, CA 95258 | $25,890 |
86 | Nellie Mc Phee | Lodi, CA 95240 | $25,289 |
87 | Jason Zumbach | Altaville, CA 95221 | $24,950 |
88 | Paul M Elliott | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $24,145 |
89 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $23,758 |
90 | Glenn Nakagawa | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $23,748 |
91 | Douglas George Bowman | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $23,595 |
92 | Keiko Nakagawa | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $23,175 |
93 | Daniel De Wees | Merced, CA 95340 | $22,648 |
94 | Cora M Smith Irrevocable Trust | West Point, CA 95255 | $22,625 |
95 | Howard Hatler | Farmington, CA 95230 | $22,231 |
96 | Will Pierie | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $21,796 |
97 | Frank Gilbeau | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $21,399 |
98 | Franziska Schabram | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $21,326 |
99 | , | $21,148 | |
100 | Charles Allured | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $21,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”