Total Disaster Programs in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 312
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $10,399,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Curtis L Dunlap | West Point, CA 95255 | $9,529 |
142 | Joesph James Fraguero | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $9,337 |
143 | Hertlein Ranches | West Point, CA 95255 | $8,984 |
144 | Clifford Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $8,832 |
145 | Sandi Young | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $8,810 |
146 | John P Raggio | Farmington, CA 95230 | $8,771 |
147 | Anthony W Borba | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $8,636 |
148 | William J Swarbrick | West Point, CA 95255 | $8,454 |
149 | Airola Ranches | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $8,384 |
150 | John Gurr | Merced, CA 95340 | $8,366 |
151 | William Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $8,263 |
152 | Damon Eugene Pombo | Tracy, CA 95304 | $8,237 |
153 | Mark Mathre | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $8,105 |
154 | Michael Tenente | Clements, CA 95227 | $8,015 |
155 | Jay U Beirn | West Point, CA 95255 | $7,839 |
156 | Lenn F Nicholson | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $7,612 |
157 | Mark Beck | Acampo, CA 95220 | $7,572 |
158 | Raymond Alger | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $7,507 |
159 | Rasmussen 2001 Revocable Trust Au | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $7,432 |
160 | Patricia J Morales | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $7,201 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”