Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Calaveras County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $566,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Airola Cattle Company LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $117,381 |
2 | Stan Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $57,018 |
3 | J W Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $51,681 |
4 | John Davies | Avery, CA 95224 | $46,217 |
5 | Michael D Fischer Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $31,934 |
6 | Zane Gookin | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $27,408 |
7 | Matt Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $26,602 |
8 | Ron Spence | Altaville, CA 95221 | $26,168 |
9 | Mattley Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $24,650 |
10 | Daniel Kuiken | Volcano, CA 95689 | $19,648 |
11 | , | $19,553 | |
12 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $17,177 |
13 | Steven Todd Garcia | Ione, CA 95640 | $15,512 |
14 | Gerald Dunn | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $15,069 |
15 | Sandra Rader | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $11,849 |
16 | Hans A Zumbach | Angels Camp, CA 95221 | $11,547 |
17 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $11,321 |
18 | Matt Engelhart | Linden, CA 95236 | $5,370 |
19 | Les Strojan | Farmington, CA 95230 | $5,073 |
20 | Don Peirano | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $4,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>