Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Calaveras County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $155,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Yvonne Tiscornia | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $26,933 |
2 | Airola Cattle Company LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $22,524 |
3 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $18,665 |
4 | Michael D Fischer Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $12,234 |
5 | Alexander B Mckeon Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $11,190 |
6 | Sandra Rader | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $8,762 |
7 | Rock Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $7,142 |
8 | Matt Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $6,536 |
9 | Perry Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $6,358 |
10 | Ron Spence | Altaville, CA 95221 | $5,633 |
11 | John Davies | Avery, CA 95224 | $4,820 |
12 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $4,508 |
13 | Cinco Cattle Company LLC | Wilton, CA 95693 | $4,504 |
14 | Richard Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $4,173 |
15 | Libby Rader-kassik | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $2,819 |
16 | Kevin Griffith | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $2,150 |
17 | Gerald Dunn | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $1,789 |
18 | Don Peirano | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $1,219 |
19 | Lance Oneto | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $1,133 |
20 | Rasmussen Ranch LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $1,131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>