Farm Subsidy information
Calaveras County, California
Total Subsidies in Calaveras County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $1,161,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Garamendi | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $15,542 |
22 | Rasmussen Ranch LLC | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $13,716 |
23 | Cinco Cattle Company LLC | Wilton, CA 95693 | $13,423 |
24 | John Davies | Avery, CA 95224 | $13,284 |
25 | Daniel Kuiken | Volcano, CA 95689 | $13,226 |
26 | Rolleri Ranch | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $13,053 |
27 | Mattley Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $11,979 |
28 | Merle Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $9,564 |
29 | Roddy Scherff | Burson, CA 95225 | $9,341 |
30 | Richard Cowden Rolleri | Altaville, CA 95221 | $9,135 |
31 | Rolleri Vineyard | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $8,736 |
32 | Karl Wiebe | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $8,136 |
33 | Perry Whittle | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $7,942 |
34 | Donald R Whittle Jr | Altaville, CA 95221 | $7,210 |
35 | Relando Broglio | Altaville, CA 95221 | $7,168 |
36 | Rock Creek Land & Cattle LLC | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $6,893 |
37 | Elliott Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $6,826 |
38 | Jason Zumbach | Farmington, CA 95230 | $6,820 |
39 | Kelly Wooster | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $5,875 |
40 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $5,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”