Total Emergency Relief Program in Colusa County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 309
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $13,011,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M & B Almonds | Williams, CA 95987 | $165,471 |
22 | T&p Farms | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $158,568 |
23 | Sean V Doherty Farms | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $158,396 |
24 | Matthew Robert Wallace | Colusa, CA 95932 | $143,232 |
25 | Wildwood Orchards | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $131,654 |
26 | J T & K Kalfsbeek | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $119,306 |
27 | Sid Lagrande Brent Lagrande Leo Lagrande Tenants I | Williams, CA 95987 | $116,333 |
28 | James L Campbell | Princeton, CA 95970 | $115,033 |
29 | Mumma Brothers | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $103,007 |
30 | Lohman Apiaries Inc | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $100,808 |
31 | Hickel & Hickel | Colusa, CA 95932 | $99,422 |
32 | White Road Farms | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $98,530 |
33 | C L 5 | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $97,165 |
34 | Baker Creek Farming | Colusa, CA 95932 | $94,843 |
35 | Sallie E Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $92,821 |
36 | Thunder Nut, LLC | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $91,349 |
37 | Freshwater Farms Inc | Williams, CA 95987 | $89,825 |
38 | Struckmeyer Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $88,102 |
39 | Robert L Wallace Irrv Trust | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $87,461 |
40 | David & Shirley Olney Family Rev | Napa, CA 94558 | $85,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”