Conservation Reserve Program in Colusa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 103
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $2,234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Too Far Farms | Fair Oaks, CA 95628 | $9,085 |
42 | The Don H Zumwalt And Jill Zumwal | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $8,796 |
43 | William E Bickell | Roseville, CA 95747 | $8,580 |
44 | Fred & Beverly Durst Family Revoc | Grimes, CA 95950 | $8,192 |
45 | John Oakes | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $7,881 |
46 | Todd Eschelman | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 | $7,880 |
47 | Scott Eschelman | Woodside, CA 94602 | $7,880 |
48 | Timothy J Oakes | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $7,880 |
49 | Wilmarth Ranch LLC | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $7,394 |
50 | Dave Huffmaster | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $6,498 |
51 | Bob Huffmaster | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $6,498 |
52 | Jeff Stancil | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $5,790 |
53 | The 1993 Maudru Family Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $5,472 |
54 | Jack R Mcmills | Willows, CA 95988 | $4,950 |
55 | Bell Outing LLC | Pacifica, CA 94044 | $4,224 |
56 | Jerry Schlink | Middletown, CA 95461 | $3,135 |
57 | Brett L Risley | Napa, CA 94559 | $3,135 |
58 | Stan Engel | Vallejo, CA 94590 | $3,135 |
59 | Robert Winchell | Napa, CA 94558 | $3,135 |
60 | Dr Robert Morris | Napa, CA 94558 | $3,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”