Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Contra Costa County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Contra Costa County, California totaled $652,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $10,590 |
22 | Joseph C Borges | Byron, CA 94514 | $9,666 |
23 | Srs Ventures | Clements, CA 95227 | $8,980 |
24 | , | $8,305 | |
25 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $7,984 |
26 | Albert Batteate | Livermore, CA 94551 | $7,204 |
27 | Elmiro Belo | Byron, CA 94514 | $6,791 |
28 | Thomas Magee | Danville, CA 94506 | $5,733 |
29 | John R Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $5,684 |
30 | John Rasmussen | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $5,655 |
31 | Robert A Devries | Livermore, CA 94550 | $5,453 |
32 | , | $4,967 | |
33 | Dennis Lopez | Byron, CA 94514 | $4,875 |
34 | Roseanna P Silva | Tracy, CA 95304 | $4,841 |
35 | Carissa Koopmann Rivers | Sunol, CA 94586 | $4,406 |
36 | Robert Pombo | Tracy, CA 95304 | $4,076 |
37 | Bryan Smith | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $3,615 |
38 | Fields Livestock | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $3,506 |
39 | Nick Batteate | Litchfield, CA 96117 | $3,484 |
40 | Dan Galvin | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $3,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”