Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Contra Costa County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Contra Costa County, California totaled $1,288,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bert R Elworthy | Castro Valley, CA 94552 | $129,855 |
2 | Duane F Martin Jr | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $125,881 |
3 | John R Ginochio III | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $106,356 |
4 | Edward M Ginochio | Clayton, CA 94517 | $64,827 |
5 | Robert And Sandra Sanders Living Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $59,216 |
6 | Dominic Compaglia | Martinez, CA 94553 | $55,274 |
7 | , | $49,015 | |
8 | John Pereira | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $48,296 |
9 | Lawrence E Ginochio | Concord, CA 94524 | $43,703 |
10 | , | $43,500 | |
11 | Brody A. Sanders | Clayton, CA 94517 | $38,624 |
12 | Rjn Inc - Dba H&n Enterprises | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $36,914 |
13 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $36,021 |
14 | Joseph C Borges | Byron, CA 94514 | $35,587 |
15 | Jacqueline Stewart | Clayton, CA 94517 | $29,389 |
16 | John R Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $25,874 |
17 | Elmiro Belo | Byron, CA 94514 | $25,504 |
18 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $25,265 |
19 | Peter Swanson | Tracy, CA 95377 | $25,079 |
20 | Daniel Morais | Martinez, CA 94553 | $25,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>