Total Commodity Programs in Contra Costa County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 200
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Contra Costa County, California totaled $12,966,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alba C Houston Orchard Co Inc | Byron, CA 94514 | $190,625 |
22 | Emerson Dairy Inc | Oakley, CA 94561 | $182,050 |
23 | Rbc Orwood Inc | Discovery Bay, CA 94505 | $176,191 |
24 | Jaime Rodriguez Jr | Isleton, CA 95641 | $145,101 |
25 | John Ramos | Patterson, CA 95363 | $142,962 |
26 | Premier Fruit Trees LLC | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $134,472 |
27 | Scott Bedford | Tracy, CA 95304 | $128,597 |
28 | Bloomfield Vineyards | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $126,398 |
29 | Rjn Inc - Dba H&n Enterprises | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $125,997 |
30 | Greg Torlai | Holt, CA 95234 | $117,612 |
31 | Edward M Ginochio | Clayton, CA 94517 | $112,919 |
32 | Wood Livestock LLC | Lafayette, CA 94549 | $111,878 |
33 | David Dal Porto | Oakley, CA 94561 | $111,122 |
34 | John R Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $108,460 |
35 | Mark Dwelley | Oakley, CA 94561 | $87,457 |
36 | A Marie Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $80,500 |
37 | Lawrence De Borba | Byron, CA 94514 | $79,127 |
38 | Bear State Estates | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $74,522 |
39 | Mjp LLC | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $65,392 |
40 | John R Ginochio III | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $63,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”