Farm Subsidy information
Del Norte County, California
Total Subsidies in Del Norte County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 93
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Del Norte County, California totaled $6,520,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas Miller | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $13,206 |
62 | Kurt Robert Ivison | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $12,682 |
63 | Fred Soares | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $12,556 |
64 | Paul C Madeira | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $12,129 |
65 | Clell Jason Haberman | Gasquet, CA 95543 | $11,878 |
66 | David Haddad | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $11,855 |
67 | Michael E Rickner | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $11,421 |
68 | Jody May | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $11,182 |
69 | Thomas L Coopman | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $10,819 |
70 | Ronnie T Caron | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $9,475 |
71 | Esther Stewart | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $8,128 |
72 | John Marques | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $6,678 |
73 | Richard Russell | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $6,455 |
74 | Ocean View Beef LLC | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $6,172 |
75 | Robert Warren Orloff | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $5,152 |
76 | Seabreeze Farms | Klamath, CA 95548 | $4,162 |
77 | Mark Mellett | Klamath, CA 95548 | $3,906 |
78 | Ferguson Family Trust | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $3,561 |
79 | Marla L Zuber | Orick, CA 95555 | $3,250 |
80 | Marty R Lopez | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $2,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”