Farm Subsidy information

Del Norte County, California

Total Subsidies in Del Norte County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 93

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Del Norte County, California totaled $5,771,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco DairyCrescent City, CA 95531$1,052,139
2Palmer Westbrook IncSmith River, CA 95567$776,864
3Reservation RanchSmith River, CA 95567$494,382
4Robert TedsenCrescent City, CA 95531$368,688
5Dahlstrom & Watt Bulb Farms, IncSmith River, CA 95567$316,111
6Wetherell Ranch IncFort Dick, CA 95538$218,210
7Jordan Creek Family Ltd PtnshpCrescent City, CA 95531$188,245
8Baf Fishers, IncCrescent City, CA 95531$108,830
9F-v Pacific Pride Inc.Crescent City, CA 95531$103,074
10Abalone InternationalCrescent City, CA 95531$100,000
11Waldo V TaylorCrescent City, CA 95531$90,569
12Sea Pearl IncCrescent City, CA 95531$85,483
13Bountiful Oceans, IncCrescent City, CA 95531$84,621
14Fv Gladnik, IncCrescent City, CA 95531$74,144
15F/v Pollux, IncCrescent City, CA 95531$71,627
16David J ShogrenCrescent City, CA 95531$68,070
17Stanco Enterprises, IncCrescent City, CA 95531$66,543
18Fv Donita, LLCCrescent City, CA 95531$64,420
19Rose Marie IncGasquet, CA 95543$56,968
20Wesley C TaylorCrescent City, CA 95531$56,627

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag