Total Commodity Programs in Del Norte County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 87
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Del Norte County, California totaled $5,285,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Blake J Alexandre | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $55,311 |
22 | F/v Viking Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $52,045 |
23 | Richard Wetherell | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $49,039 |
24 | Charles Juke Williams | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $48,500 |
25 | Richard Nehmer | Smith River, CA 95567 | $48,226 |
26 | F/v Lori, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $47,172 |
27 | Joey Borges | Smith River, CA 95567 | $47,165 |
28 | Darin Alan, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $45,663 |
29 | Kurt Hochberg | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $41,834 |
30 | Jonathon Beardon | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $36,424 |
31 | David Todd Nickel | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $36,303 |
32 | F/v Spirt Of '76, Inc | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $35,096 |
33 | Sea Hunter, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $34,283 |
34 | F-v Sunset Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $31,762 |
35 | William Vearl Debacker | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $25,449 |
36 | F-v Mary Lu Inc. | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $24,669 |
37 | Douglas E Cairns | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $22,508 |
38 | F/v Maranatha Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $22,498 |
39 | Jesse Dylan Wood | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $22,271 |
40 | Kenneth J Graves | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $22,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”