Total Commodity Programs in Del Norte County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 87
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Del Norte County, California totaled $5,937,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth J Graves | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $22,051 |
42 | Alan Mello | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $20,945 |
43 | Seeadler LLC | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $20,560 |
44 | Due North Harvesters | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $20,522 |
45 | Ulrich Dairy | Smith River, CA 95567 | $19,949 |
46 | Juggernaut Fisheries Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $19,533 |
47 | Andy Schneider | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $18,324 |
48 | Andrew C Evanow | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $17,860 |
49 | Fishing Vessel Survial Too | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $17,693 |
50 | Allen Loretz | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $16,898 |
51 | Fv Charlie D, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $15,487 |
52 | F/v Ingot, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $14,970 |
53 | Thomas H Danielsen | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $14,067 |
54 | Andrew D Evanow Jr | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $13,630 |
55 | Tsv Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $13,579 |
56 | Thomas Miller | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $13,206 |
57 | Kurt Robert Ivison | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $12,682 |
58 | Fred Soares | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $12,556 |
59 | Paul C Madeira | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $12,129 |
60 | Clell Jason Haberman | Gasquet, CA 95543 | $11,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”