Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Fresno County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 250
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $1,988,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Boparai Farms | Fowler, CA 93625 | $26,364 |
22 | West Side Ranches LLC Baldev Singh Mbr | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $26,286 |
23 | Jasbir Sidhu | Kerman, CA 93630 | $25,650 |
24 | Vidal Reyna | Reedley, CA 93654 | $25,493 |
25 | Allison Hughes | Clovis, CA 93619 | $25,065 |
26 | Erickson Ag. Service Inc | Fresno, CA 93725 | $21,855 |
27 | Debbie Combs | Fresno, CA 93755 | $21,078 |
28 | Deborah A Wood | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $20,231 |
29 | Elizabeth Anne Chaney | Fresno, CA 93711 | $20,125 |
30 | Huerta Family Farms Inc | Reedley, CA 93654 | $19,891 |
31 | North Pointe Farming LLC | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $19,618 |
32 | Karen Carvalho | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $18,881 |
33 | Sihota Farms Inc | Selma, CA 93662 | $18,831 |
34 | Avtar S Gill | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $17,874 |
35 | Jitendra Kaur Sihota | Selma, CA 93662 | $17,577 |
36 | , | $17,506 | |
37 | Cardenas Farms | Dinuba, CA 93618 | $17,218 |
38 | J Yribarren Farms Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $17,107 |
39 | Aulakh Farms Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $16,565 |
40 | Nijjar Farms Inc. | Selma, CA 93662 | $16,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”