Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 491
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $8,004,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leroy Del Don Jr | Patterson, CA 95363 | $37,120 |
42 | Errecart Farms Inc | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $37,120 |
43 | Pereira Farms | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $37,120 |
44 | Turlock Fruit Co Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $37,120 |
45 | Olivera Inc | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $37,120 |
46 | Jeremy S Hughes | Clovis, CA 93619 | $37,120 |
47 | Emilio Calzada | Fresno, CA 93777 | $37,120 |
48 | Allison Hughes | Clovis, CA 93619 | $37,120 |
49 | Beene & Sons Inc | Helm, CA 93627 | $37,120 |
50 | Cathy Calzada | Fresno, CA 93777 | $37,120 |
51 | Open Sky Ranch Inc | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $37,120 |
52 | Etchegoinberry Family Limited Par | Fresno, CA 93722 | $37,087 |
53 | Delgado Farming Inc | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $37,080 |
54 | Lauro Parra | Fresno, CA 93711 | $37,080 |
55 | Kasiner Farms Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $37,080 |
56 | Usc Farms LLC | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $37,080 |
57 | Fred Rau Dairy Inc | Fresno, CA 93706 | $36,957 |
58 | J & J Farms LLC | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $36,734 |
59 | A And A Farms | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $36,678 |
60 | Westbase Farms | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $36,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”