Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 491
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $8,004,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | 5c Farms II | Five Points, CA 93624 | $36,131 |
62 | Bear Canyon Fms Inc | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $35,386 |
63 | Sandra Del Don | Patterson, CA 95363 | $34,891 |
64 | Five S Ranch | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $34,127 |
65 | Brinkley Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $33,791 |
66 | Larry Enos | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $33,628 |
67 | Fortune Farming 5 | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $33,126 |
68 | Marlu Farms | Five Points, CA 93624 | $32,786 |
69 | Abercrombie Farms | Kerman, CA 93630 | $32,758 |
70 | John A. Kochergen Properties Inc | Fresno, CA 93711 | $32,613 |
71 | Simcot Farms | Five Points, CA 93624 | $32,519 |
72 | Vincent J Coelho Daddy's Pride Farming | Hanford, CA 93232 | $32,335 |
73 | Fontes Dairy Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $32,258 |
74 | Van Der Kooi Family Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $32,132 |
75 | Octavia G Diener Living Trust | Five Points, CA 93624 | $32,059 |
76 | Pifferini Ranch | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $31,850 |
77 | Santa Fe Farms | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $31,580 |
78 | Brooks Farms I | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $31,567 |
79 | Sagardia Bros Farms | Fresno, CA 93711 | $31,238 |
80 | Motte Ranches Inc | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $31,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”