Loan Deficiency in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 707
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $38,149,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Maddox Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $180,530 |
62 | Weis & Son Farming | Madera, CA 93637 | $177,710 |
63 | J & J Farms | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $174,192 |
64 | Michael S Mc Claran | Madera, CA 93638 | $170,670 |
65 | Polvadero Farms Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $170,331 |
66 | Llanada Farms | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $168,584 |
67 | Rancho De La Esperanza | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $167,879 |
68 | Rabb Agricultural Associates | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $162,191 |
69 | Hugh Bennett Ranch Inc | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $161,881 |
70 | Wood Brothers Farm | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $161,166 |
71 | Laguna Farms | Pinedale, CA 93650 | $160,267 |
72 | Joaquin Ridge Farms Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $158,078 |
73 | J Giacone & Son | Mendota, CA 93640 | $157,691 |
74 | Teixeira And Sons | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $157,274 |
75 | M P Farms LLC | Fresno, CA 93704 | $156,231 |
76 | Fortune Farming 1 | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $154,381 |
77 | Frank J Faria Farming | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $151,532 |
78 | Forest O Beebower | Madera, CA 93636 | $150,000 |
79 | Charles Mc Kean | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $149,044 |
80 | James Burford Farming Co | Fresno, CA 93711 | $147,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”