Farm Subsidy information
Fresno County, California
Total Subsidies in Fresno County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 743
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $119,696,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Iqbal S Brar | Fowler, CA 93625 | $166,386 |
82 | Van Der Kooi Family Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $165,391 |
83 | Nijjar Farms Inc. | Selma, CA 93662 | $165,228 |
84 | Rollin Valley Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $164,100 |
85 | Cheryl Allen | Fresno, CA 93722 | $163,780 |
86 | Bakhtawar Singh Virk | Fresno, CA 93725 | $163,702 |
87 | Christopher Todd Allen | Fresno, CA 93722 | $163,073 |
88 | Charles Heuring | Fresno, CA 93722 | $163,044 |
89 | Pappas Farming Company II Lp | Mendota, CA 93640 | $161,213 |
90 | Jodi D Helmuth | Fresno, CA 93711 | $159,367 |
91 | Cornelis Kamper Rodney Kamper Mt Whitney Dairy | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $156,823 |
92 | Warren Leslie Davis | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $156,479 |
93 | North Pointe Farming LLC | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $155,943 |
94 | Amrik Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93723 | $155,845 |
95 | Robert Gonzales | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $155,145 |
96 | , | $153,886 | |
97 | Joludi Enterprise Inc | Fresno, CA 93706 | $153,705 |
98 | Vineland Vineyard Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $153,055 |
99 | , | $152,446 | |
100 | A & To Dairy | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $152,382 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”